|
lzm Patent (liaison) Office
10 Ava Road,
Ava Tower #19-07 Singapore 329949
Blk C-4,
13/F., Wing Hing Ind. Bldg., Hing Yip St.,Kwun Tong, Kln,
H.K.
Tel :
(852) 3618-7808 9175-1482 6572-0195 (86) 755 2535-3546 FAX : (852) 3111-4197 3007-8352
Websites:
www.ycec.com &
www.ycec.net Email:
ycec_lzm@yahoo.com.hk
|
Respectable
President of the
Legislative Council
MP
Leung Kwan-yuen
Dear Sir: |
1 Legislative Council Road
Central, HK
Legislative Council Complex
Public Complaints Office
Tel: 3919 3919 Fax: 2521 7518
complaints@legco.gov.hk |
本人林哲民,
HKID D188015(3).
有關貴立會檔號：CP/C
85/2020
I, Lin Zhen Man, HKID D188015 (3), about
your LegCo Ref No：CP/C
85/2020
本於2020.5.15日信件，就因衛生署就以天然、體外之物再“確診”偽造為體內病態如此顛倒醫學倫理及反骨透頂的“隔離令”為立法會批凖有錯在先，市民均被愚弄及全港經濟損失重大，但阁下2020.5.28日回信『“確診手段可能涉及刑事控罪事件”不属立法申訴制度處理範圍』告知拒絕處理，本人只得2020.6.03日再傳真去信催促閣下務必处理，就因：
In
my email sent on
May 15, 2020,
on
account of the Department of
Health only by natural,
out of body thing again to
"diagnosis"
fake for in body
morbidity
in this way to upside down medical ethics and anti-bone
terrible of the "isolation
order" from the LegCo approved that
had wrong earlier, so all citizens were to fooled
and lead HK economic losses great, but you to write on
May 15, 2020 in reply『"diagnosis
methods may involve criminal charges event" is not a
legislative appeal system deal with the scope of』refuse
handle to inform me, so I only again by a letter on June
03, 2020 to urge you must to handle, it because of:
|
根據A501立法議事規則22.貴主席有責任向衛生署提出質詢並指明書面答復，是否？
According A501 rules of procedure
of legislation 22.
,
chairman you has the
responsibility to interpellation the
Department of
Health
and specifies a write reply, yet or not? 
又根據基本法73條，立法會的職權（6）及（8）有關公共利益問題務必要辯論及接受香港居民申訴並作出處理，是否？
And according to
the 73 Article of Basic Law, the mandate ( 6 )
and ( 8 ) of Legislative Council that concerning
public interests must to debate and to accept a
HK’s resident complaints and handle, yet
or not? |
也特别告知：『 如警務處在5月底4天內竟有三警猝死之關鍵死因就在戴口罩防疫力度有限且令吸呼困難缺氧如高山症患者血液缺氧腦中風，中國駐以色列大使也如此半夜猝死，更如
www.ycec.sg/HK/200519-mask-murder.pdf
可見，早在4月份在國內就有4中學生戴口罩跑步猝死！』或詳閱附件，也在
www.ycec.sg/HK/200602.pdf
可見本去信警務處長之“戴口罩不就等如一謀殺陷阱”可令高山症的腦細胞死亡日增如不猝死也將令仼何病變可突發命短更在此信中一清二楚！
Also
specifically told:『As
the Police in
four days of
the end of May that
unexpectedly had three constables to
sudden death
of the key causes of death just in wearing masks the
epidemic prevention is limited but it could be to lead
the
anaerobic respiration as a
mountain sickness patient's blood-anoxic
brain
apoplexy,
as Chinese Ambassador of
Israel
also suddenly died in the
midnight,
the more such as
www.ycec.sg/HK/200519-mask-murder.pdf
visible back in
April in inland of China there are four middle school
students wearing masks to run so to sudden
death!』or
to read the attachments, and also can to see at
www.ycec.sg/HK/200602e.pdf
I just now a letter to
the Commissioner of Police that "wear
masks not like a murder trap" can cause the
increase of brain cell death and day by
day as a mountain sickness patient if not to
sudden death
for a short while it will also make other any
pathological changes can be short-lived perfectly
described clearly in this letter!
也即在如此重大的公眾生命利益面前，閣下仍於2020.6.08日同樣以『“戴口罩不就等如一謀殺陷阱”可能涉及刑事控罪事件不属立法申訴處理範圍』告知拒絕處理，顯然不可一錯再錯！
That is
such an important public lives benefits before,
but you on June 08, 2020 still claim by
『"wear
masks not like a murder trap may involve
criminal charges event" is not a legislative appeal
system deal with the scope of』refuse
handle to inform me, apparently can’t be wrong again
and again!
|
首先犯下刑事罪的是食物衛生局及衛生署已令閣下無疑，如閣下不依A501立法議事規則提出質詢並指明書面答復必令公眾也可問責
是否合夥屠殺公眾生命疑犯？如下：
The first to commit a
penal offense
is that the Food
and Health Bureau and the
Department of Health already to
made you undoubtedly,
if you do not according
A501 rules
of procedure of legislation to
bring up an interpellation and specifies a
write reply it
will lead the public also can to
accountability you
whether a suspect
of slaughtering public lives in partnership?
As
follows:
其一，立法會議員有監察政府工作职責，在如此的刑事罪面前不質詢已触犯公職人員行為失當罪表證首先在此成立且更已合乎《證據條例》O.15可公訴定罪；
Firstly, the
member of
LegCo
had
responsibilities to supervise the work of
Gov.,
in such
penal offense
before if not to
interpellation to offend
Misfeasance in public office
that
superficial evidence
already first in here to
set up and
in line with
Cap.8《Evidence
Ordinance》O.15
can to
be indictable conviction of
public prosecution;
其二，詐稱不屬立法申訴處理範圍也触犯了Cap.284《失實陳述條例》、偽造文書罪及Cap.200《刑事罪行條例》O.36
&
O.38更等如合夥屠殺公眾必然首先也令Cap.201《防止賄賂條例》O.12A串謀之罪表證成立，及由O.19也可見不屬免責辯護，律政司可據O.23獲取證據更由O.24可見閣下更有自我舉證否認責任；
Secondly.
to arrogation is
not an appeal scope of
LegCo also to offend
Cap.284《Misrepresentation
Ordinance》Crime
of forgery
and
Cap.200《Crimes
Ordinance》O.36
&
O.38
more equal to
partnership
slaughter
public
it inevitable
first also made
Cap.201《prevention
of bribery Ordinance》O.12A
Conspiracy
Crime
the
superficial evidence
to
establishment, and the
O.19
also visible is not belong to a
custom not to be a defence,
the
department of Justice
may be according
O.23 to
obtain evidence more by
O.24 visible Excellency still
more have to give
proof to deny
responsibility by self;
其三，拒绝質詢食衛局如同合伙强迫市民戴口罩也触犯Cap.
427《刑事罪行(酷刑)條例
》；
Thirdly.
refusing to question the
Food and Health
Bureau as a partnership to force
citizens to wear masks also
offends
Cap. 427《Crimes
(Torture) Ordinance》；
其四，立法会批準造假“確診”手段之隔离令也触犯Cap.212《侵害人身罪條例》O.5串謀或唆使謀殺及Cap.383《香港人權法案條例》；
Fourthly, LegCo
to authorized the
quarantine order by
counterfeit "diagnosis"
means
also to offend
Cap.212《Offences
against the Person Ordinance》O.5
Conspiring or soliciting to commit murder
and Cap.383《Hong
Kong Bill of Rights Ordinance》；
其五，也在閣下拒绝質詢的庇護下，衛生署又继续利用造假的“確診”手段令才7天可用的健康碼均要仠元以上難道继续合夥打劫市民金錢有錢分？显然已令Cap.210《盜竊罪條例》O.2已確認可公訴，廉署更可根據《廉政公署條例》O.10無需手令可逮捕歸案；
Fifthly,
under the shelter by you refuse to
interpellation,
so
the
Department of Health
again
continue to
use that fraud "diagnosis"
means just can to let only seven days
available
health-code
even
must
above
thousand HKD is it still to continue
partnership robbery the money of
citizen and you have the money
divided? It obviously
to
offend Cap.210《Theft
Ordinance》O.2
already
to affirm permit by public prosecution,
and the ICAC
more according to
Cap. 204《Independent
Commission Against Corruption Ordinance》O.10
no warrant just can to arrested go to court; |
|
