|
Dear , At the time when the world health conference is underway, I would like to propose my new SARS treatment plan to you and the WHO. Called “Surface Treatment of SARS-Infected Lungs”, this plan was faxed to the Hong Kong chief administrative executive and the relevant Chinese leader at 4:30 PM May 15 2003. It takes only a few days for the plan to begin clinic trial and I’m sure that plan will benefit the world. Main Points: *。 The sterilizing liquid injected into lung lobes is the surface treatment liquid for O1 therapy of the lungs. The formal name for this liquid is Per fluoro chemicals(PFC) and the sterilizer is Ozone. *。 This method of introducing supersonic wave with sterilizing liquid may make SARS virus less adsorptive and quickly clear viruses in the lungs. This new and practical therapy works like bombing the SARS virus with smart cruise missiles. The missile is single oxygen (O1) separated from ozone, hence “O1 Therapy”! Please to look-through my web site of www.ycec.net/SARS-to-die-e.htm and I hope WHO push to all national of government sanitary department urgent to engineer to clinical practice, save person as same fire fighting! I would like to refer to my April 17, 2003 letter to WHO and would also mention WHO-issued report on the causes for SARS cases in Taoda Building. On April 17, 2003 Hong Kong media says WHO experts agree with the report submitted by the Hong Kong Health Bureau. But we find some points in the report do not hold water: 1. The WHO report agrees that the SARS case in Taoda Building results from fecal sewage in thedried-up U-shaped pipes. I think it is incorrect, because the report provided by the Hong Kong Health Bureau does not specify which dwelling in the building has the dried-up U-shaped pipes? 2. The breakage of the sewage pipes only on the 4th floor of Taoda Building mentioned in the WHO report is not definitely the source of infection, because few people to life below the 7th floor are infected, but the sewage cannot flow upward, why can to prove to be cause the widespread infection above the7th floor? Now, the Hong Kong Health Bureau justifies its mistakes with the WHO report. That is unfair for Hong Kong citizens and will contribute to the breakdown of social justice of the Hong Kong community. Therefore, the report must be corrected to avoid misleading other countries in their SARS-containing efforts! But on the other hand, the Hong Kong government has been controlling the epidemic actively and effectively. Surface Treatment of SARS-Infected Lungs will find applications, and SARS will no longer be fatal. WHO tourism warning against Hong Kong has led to the anxiety of Hong Kong people and put Hong Kong into great trouble.
I beg WHO to lift the tourism warning before schedule.
Respectfully yours
Zhen-Man Lin
Hong Kong D188015 May.20, 2003 |
中英文在
www.ycec.net/To_WHO-200503.htm
或
！
|
籍著世界衛生大會的舉行， 本人僅此向大會及WHO推薦本人醫治SARS的最新方案成果， 該方案爲“肺部SARS的表面處理”， 已於2003年5月15日下午4:30傳真給香港的行政長官及中國領導人。 該方案只要數天的時間便可進入臨床驗證，該方案應該惠及世界各國。 要點: 注入到肺葉的消毒液體是表面處理液體的單氧疔法。這種液體的正式的名字是全氟化合物(PFC) 及消毒劑則爲臭氧。 如處理液體輸送入肺葉時導入超聲波可以提高克服SARS的吸附性快速清理肺孔中的病菌。這是全新實用的醫療方案，藥效産生是直接面對著SARS病菌細胞發射聰明巡航導彈。而這導彈的名稱正是由臭氧析出的單氧O1，因此稱“單氧療法”! 請從 www.ycec.net/SARS-to-die-e.htm 的本網頁看而不漏，及本人希望世界衛生組織可推廣給所有國家的衛生部門緊急策劃臨床實踐，救人如同射擊搏鬥! 本人亦重提於4月17日向WHO的信件， 亦將提及世衛發表的香港淘大大廈的感染成因報告。4月17日香港的報紙說WHO專家認同了香港衛生署提供的報告。但我們發覺報告有很多是沒有根據的： 1. WHO報告書贊成淘大的感染由U型管乾枯污水渠傳染不是正確的， 因为香港衛生署提供的報告没有舉例指出該大廈有哪一單位的糞便渠U型管乾枯的單位； 2. 世衛報告即然承認的淘大大廈4樓的污水渠爆裂不足成爲感染的来源，因爲被7樓以下的單位少有人被感染推翻；那麽污水渠又爲怎麽會倒流而上成爲7樓以上單位大量感染的證據？ 現在是香港衛生署拿著WHO的報告書爲自已的錯誤辯護， 這對香港市民不公， 無形中加速香港社會公義的崩潰！ 因此報告書有須要更正， 免得誤導其他國家對SARS的防疫措施！ 但另一方面香港政府也積極有效地控制了疫情，“肺部SARS的表面處理”將會很得到運用，SARS将不再危害人类的生命，香港的地位特殊，WHO的旅游警告巳导至社会的不安及困境。
本人恳求WHO提前解除香港的旅游警告。
Respectfully yours Zhen-Man Lin
Hong Kong D188015 May. 20, 2003 |