www.ycec.sg/UN/120617/witness-history.htm
Above the fact, why the USA office
always attempt
lawless to cancel
this
invention of only can to cure SARS, bird flu, phthisis
etc. and
also includes a "temperature difference¡¨ or
proverb ¡§refrigeration¡¨ treatment that already to open a
save life big windows for cancer patient and succeed
application in HK hospital reported by newspaper on
2003year?
To
see the
www.ycec.sg/Cure-cancer.htm!
On
account the false and harmful of ¡§vaccine" that is already
unmask from my this invention!
It
though the fake vaccine original western "invention" but
reuse under the current CP-China dynasty that tool for the
stupid people, and Hong Kong
began on July of 1997
later by the Margaret
Chan Fung Fu-chun
to inveigled 1.2 million under 18years student with
children to shot three dosage ¡§measles
vaccine¡¨, you can see the
www.ycec.sg/HK/161007.htm
or
www.ycec.sg/HK/161007e.pdfpdf;
|
|
Therefore, as above right
picture that
download on the website, the
bribe trick of CP China that already "well-known" worldwide and the fact
as the inventor lzm just had
a letter to
President
Donald Trump
on November 03,
2017, to see the
www.ycec.sg/HK/171103.pdf
or Chinese at:
www.ycec.sg/HK/171103-hk.pdf
I
hope the
USA
prosecutor could intervene and investigate this case, which is similar to the case of the Sweden
prosecutor.
II.
Application-Specifics in
US patent Office
All as
the link if not find, you can to change for
www.ycec.sg, thank you!
1
|
Application
in US-patent
on Aug.13, 2003
|
Letter to US Patent Officer on Jan.
05, 2004
|
2
|
|
Letter
to US Patent Officer on Jan. 25,
2004
|
3
|
Denunciation
under PCT patent Law on Apr.27, 2004
|
4
|
The
receipt of US patent office July.15, 04
Publication
Date 12/16/2004
|
After the denunciation under PCT patent Law file on Apr.27,
2004, the US patent office has to admit and send me a
office
receipt on
July.15,
2004. with
notifying the
publication date on Dec.16,
2004.
The
publication
documents is the same as the
preliminary amendment filed on Aug.13, 2003 and the
amendment documents that was
filed
in US Patent Office on Jan. 25, 2004.
The office receipt that shows six drawings and a total of eight
claims, the substitute specification was filed on
Aug.13,
2003.¡@
|
5
|
Office
amend
letter on Nov.12, 2004
PDF
¡÷
|
Respond to office on Dec.06,
2004 PDF
|
6
|
Office
amend
letter on Mar.23, 2005
PDF
¡÷
|
Respond
to office on July.18, 2005
PDF
|
7
|
First
action on Sep.30, 2005
PDF ¡÷
|
Respond
to Office on Jan.02, 2006
PDF
|
¡@
|
US
patent office was prepared to cancel this application by
unsuitable trick!
A
Notice of Extension of Time Fee of USPTO which mailed on
2/10/06.
So
I,
applicant
used the Tel: 571-272-0506 to
contact Miss Veo. of
Technical
Support Staff (TSS) to
inquire how much was the Extension Fee.
Immediately after Miss Veo. told my daughter that the
Extension Fee is $110 USD, I sent out the payment form on
Mar.10, 2006.
with a
letter to explain the same above-mentioned and provided
a decision that could be chosen by Examiner:
¡@¡yIf the office does not agree with the
explanations and apply of above-mentioned, in addition, as
per telecommunicate with your staff (TSS) on Monday, 5th
March 06, I will attach a Credit Card Payment Form for
payment the USD $110 required for extension of time fee
pursuant to ¡± 1.136(a).¡z
The officer
Miss
Veo. has
chosen
and confirm
that
the Extension Fee is $110 USD and
discovered
that
the
pay out date of Credit Card of USD $110 is on Mar.23,
2006.
|
|
8
|
Office
Letter on Feb.10, 2006
PDF
¡÷
|
Respond to Office on Mar.10,
2006
PDF
|
|
After six months of the payday of Extension fee,
the US patent office suddenly sent out a notification
regarding the canceling of this application.
In the appropriate fee as set forth in 37 CFR
1.17(a)(1)-(5), the
date of Applicant's
reply is a number of invariable then that time was admit
by a notification of Office on Feb. 10, 2006.
But the Examiner of evil
intention was a pack of lies below :
¡y
On
3/22/06. applicant's authorization for payment of
$110 was received The amount was insufficient as of
3/22/06, because by that time, a 3 month extension
of time was required.
This is what is meant by "continues to
run" and "No New Time Period is
Provided." $110 was therefore insufficient to pay
for 3 months extension of time.¡z
The
Examiner of evil intention has forgot, if
the date of Applicant's reply true could be
"continues to run" to add the
extension fee unceasing and
the Miss Veo. of Technical
Support Staff (TSS) is a
swindler?
Under the rule of US patent law, is it possible
that the office have not a duty to send a new
notification after received
the payment of $110 send in 30 days for applicant ? |
|
¡@9 |
Office
Letter on Sep.21, 2006 PDF
¡÷
|
Respond
to Office on Oct.27, 2006
PDF
|
|
10
|
Office Letter on
Apr.30, 2007 PDF
¡÷
|
Respond
to Office on May.31, 2007 PDF
|
11 |
PDF
¡÷
Email for
complain
on Jun. 18, 2007
¡÷ |
Office respond on
Jun.21, 2007 |
|
Patent examination was to be against regulations
purposely !
Link below
the 12 of
serial number
and open the page 12 of
report, the examiner was
to
stipulation that: "A
shortened statutory period for reply to this final
action is set to expire
THREE MONTHS from the mailing date of
this action. In the event a first reply is filed within
TWO MONTHS of
the mailing date of this final action and the advisory
action is not mailed until after the end of the
THREE-MONTH shortened statutory period, ..."
The
examination report
mailing date to shown on April 01, 2009,
notwithstanding
applicant
received was on
18 April 2009.
But,
applicant had a
respond
sent to Office on May.14, 2009
and
admit received
by USA patent office
and
filed on May 21, 2009, please to link
below the 13 of
serial number and open the page 2 of report,
the
respond
that
filed
date not the deadline
it was very
clear!
Why
the USA patent office could be
to
act
as a
robber office???
|
|
12 |
Office's
second examination report on18 April 2009 |
Respond
to Office on May.14, 2009
PDF
|
13
|
Office's
Advisory Action on15 June 2009
|
Respond
to Office on June.30, 2009
PDF
|
14 |
|
Respond
to Office on July.03, 2009
PDF
Witness by Singapore
post
PDF
|
Application
could be to
reaffirm,
this invention is
very important in medicine civilization of mankind society,
none of the Nobel prizes¡¦ medical achievements and the
historical value can be compared to our invention! In this
few month, after seeing my website,
www.ycec.net my invent application have already
popularize deep into every hospital of America now, any
American, without respect to any elderly or baby whom all
without exception to need this application of invent, there
is no substitute, there is since the dawn of history alone
invent only, in the same measure, the medical book of USA
must to alter still, besides, to esteem the intellectual
property is the important values of American and the way of
stand country, today, the above-mentioned Examiner¡¦s means
and behaviors were shameful!
So
the American reputation will fall because of this act if cannot repent
and reform and will everlasting to a bad reputation that will be long
remembered in medical treatment history of human.
|
PCT
patent application Surface-Treatment-of-SARS-Infected-Lungs
²Åé
ÁcÅé
LZM Patent (liaison) Office
10 Ava Road Ava Tower # 19-07 Singapore 329949
Tel: 65-63533647
Fax: 65-62585636
Yet Chong Electric Company
(Medicine Patent
Department)
Blk. C-4, 13/F., Wing Hing Ind. Bldg., 14 Hing Yip St., Kwun Tong, Kln. Hong
Kong
TEL
: (852) 3618-7808 3116-0137
(86) 755 2535-3546 FAX :
(852) 3111-4197 3007-8352
E-Mail: ycec_lzm@yahoo.com.hk; lhc_1993@yahoo.com.hk QQ-290619513
Websites
www.ycec.com
www.ycec.net
www.ycec.pk
www.ycec.sg
¡@
|
|